# FeatQ Review Flat-priced feature-voting boards with MCP access for solo founders and small SaaS teams. ## Editor's Score: 68/100 Capability lands at 16 because FeatQ does its narrow job well but is genuinely missing features that direct competitors offer at comparable or lower prices: no webhooks, no SSO, no API beyond MCP, no multi-board support, and no self-host option. The MCP endpoint is a real differentiator that prevents a lower score, but breadth is thin. Ease of use scores 20 because the setup is described as minutes-to-live, voting requires only an email address, and the pricing page is unusually transparent with no hidden tiers. Value scores 18: the flat no-per-user pricing is genuinely fair for a growing audience, and the $199 Lifetime deal is strong for early buyers, but the absence of any free tier or trial means buyers must commit $19 to $29 before confirming fit, which is a real friction point versus tools that offer a free tier. Delivery scores 14 because no substantial independent user sentiment was found to verify that the product delivers on its claims, the launch-pricing scarcity mechanics (25 boards, 50 lifetime spots) carry some urgency-marketing risk, and the feature comparison table found in search showed inconsistent checkmarks across tiers on a third-party aggregator, which the human editor should verify against the live page. ## Pros - MCP endpoint included on every plan, letting coding agents like Claude Code and Cursor pull top-voted requests as build-ready specs without manual handoff. - Flat pricing with no per-user or per-voter fees: up to 10,000 voters per board at the same monthly rate, which is rare among hosted voting tools. - One-time Lifetime founding deal at $199 for 50 spots eliminates recurring subscription cost entirely for early buyers. ## Cons - No free tier and no free trial: the only way to evaluate the product is to pay $19 or $29 and rely on the 14-day money-back guarantee. - No SSO, SAML, webhooks, or self-host option, which rules out any team with enterprise security requirements or a need for custom integrations. - Single-board architecture with no multi-board or multi-product support in any plan, so a team managing more than one product must pay separately for each board. ## Pricing Paid. - Launch Monthly: $19/mo - Launch Yearly: $144/year - Standard Monthly: $29/mo - Standard Yearly: $228/year - Founding Lifetime: $199 one-time Pricing reflects what we saw at the time of review (2026-10). Confirm current pricing on the official site. Category: AI Business Tools (https://aitoolseekers.com/category/ai-business-tools) Official site: https://featq.com/ Last verified by a human: 2026-10-29 Reviewed by a human at AI Tool Seekers, a hand-reviewed AI tools directory. Every listed tool is verified by a person before publishing. Scores are editorial opinions from a fixed rubric (capability, ease of use, value, delivery on promise) and cannot be bought; there is no pay-to-rank. Directory: https://aitoolseekers.com This review: https://aitoolseekers.com/tools/featq Methodology: https://aitoolseekers.com/how-verification-works ## Verdict FeatQ is the right pick for a solo founder or tiny SaaS team that wants a feature-voting board live in minutes and a flat bill that does not grow with audience size. The MCP endpoint is a genuine differentiator, letting coding agents like Claude Code or Cursor pull the top-voted request as a build-ready spec, but the tool has no free tier, no SSO, no webhooks, and no self-host option, which puts it behind broader tools for any team that needs those. If you run a larger product org or need per-seat access controls and integrations, look at a more capable platform instead. Best for: Solo founders and small SaaS teams wanting flat-rate feature voting with agent integration. Not for: Teams needing SSO, webhooks, self-hosting, or a free tier to evaluate before paying. ## Overview FeatQ is a hosted feature-request and voting board built around a single, tight loop: users submit requests and vote by email, the team ships the winners, and FeatQ automatically publishes the changelog and emails the voters whose requests were completed. There are no user accounts required to vote, and the bill stays flat whether 10 or 10,000 customers participate. The feature that separates FeatQ from older voting tools is its per-board MCP endpoint. Compatible coding agents, including Claude Code and Cursor, can connect directly to the board, pull the top-voted request as a build-ready spec, and mark it shipped when done. That closes the loop between customer demand and the actual development queue without any manual copy-paste. The pricing model is deliberately simple. Every plan includes the full product: the public board, voting, a five-status roadmap, changelog, embeddable widget, and MCP access. The plans differ only in payment cadence. Launch pricing locks in at $19/month or $144/year for the first 25 boards; standard pricing after that is $29/month or $228/year. A one-time Lifetime founding deal at $199 is available for up to 50 customers. What FeatQ does not do is equally important to understand. It has no SSO or SAML, no webhooks, no one-click importer from competing tools, no self-host option, and no free tier. It is a focused single-board tool, not a product management platform, and the pricing page says so plainly. ## Who should use it FeatQ fits a solo founder or a team of two to five people shipping a SaaS product who want to know what to build next without managing a complex feedback system. The flat pricing is especially useful once an audience grows: a bootstrapped product with 3,000 active voters pays the same $29/month as one with 30 voters. The MCP integration is a real draw for teams already using Claude Code or Cursor as their primary coding agent, since it removes the step of manually translating user demand into a task. Anyone who needs a free tier to evaluate the tool before committing should look elsewhere. Maxdesk, also in this directory, offers a flat-workspace-priced help desk with a more generous entry point for teams managing support alongside feedback. Teams that need SSO, webhooks, or a self-hosted deployment will find FeatQ's feature set too thin regardless of price. ## FAQ Q: Is there a free plan or free trial? A: No. FeatQ has no free plan and no free trial. Every purchase comes with a 14-day money-back guarantee: email hello@featq.com within 14 days for a full refund, including on the Lifetime deal. Q: How does launch pricing work and how long is it available? A: The first 25 boards can lock in $19/month or $144/year for the life of their subscription. Once those 25 boards are claimed, standard pricing of $29/month or $228/year applies. The Lifetime deal is a separate pool of 50 spots at $199 one-time. Q: What does the MCP endpoint actually do? A: Each board gets a standard streamable-HTTP MCP endpoint and a board-scoped bearer key. A compatible coding agent such as Claude Code or Cursor can connect to it, read the top-voted requests, and pull a build-ready spec, removing the manual step of translating user demand into a development task. Q: How many users can vote on a board? A: Every plan supports up to 10,000 voters per board at no extra charge. The bill does not change whether 10 or 10,000 customers participate. Q: Can I run multiple products on one account? A: No. Each plan covers one board. A team managing two separate products would need to purchase two separate plans, each at the applicable rate. Q: Does FeatQ support SSO or self-hosting? A: No to both. FeatQ is hosted-only and does not offer SSO, SAML, or a self-host deployment option on any plan.