Imgraft vs Leonardo.Ai
Imgraft vs Leonardo.Ai: score breakdown
Leonardo.Ai scores 86/100 against 66/100 for Imgraft, a 20-point gap. Leonardo.Ai is ahead on Capability (22 vs 15), Value (21 vs 18) and Delivery (23 vs 13); they tie on Ease of use (20). Each sub-score is out of 25.
Features and platforms
| Feature | Imgraft | Leonardo.Ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android, API |
| Best for | Solo creators and hobbyists doing occasional photo restyling | Creators needing precision and control |
| Skip if | Teams, developers needing API access, or anyone wanting text-to-image generation | Users wanting unlimited flat-rate generation |
Cost and usage limits
Imgraft has a free plan; paid plans start at $9.90/mo (Starter). Leonardo.Ai has a free plan; paid plans start at $12/month ($10/month billed yearly) (Apprentice). Imgraft's entry plan is cheaper by $2.1 a month ($9.9 vs $12).
Prices from each vendor's pricing page. Imgraft checked October 2026 · Leonardo.Ai checked October 2026
Pros and cons
Imgraft
- Genuinely free Standard tier at 1K with no credit card required, letting new users test output quality before committing.
- Transparent credit cost table shown before generation: HD 1K costs 1 credit, 2K costs 2, 4K costs 3, with failed jobs returning reserved credits.
- Permanent one-time credit packs (100 for $9.99 up to 2,400 for $149.99) give irregular users a pay-as-you-go option without a recurring subscription.
- Subscription credits expire at the end of each billing period, so a Starter subscriber who skips a month loses unused credits from their $9.90 payment with no rollover.
- No API, no team workspace, and no integrations documented anywhere on the site, which rules out any developer or multi-seat use case entirely.
- Built on undisclosed third-party AI models rather than a proprietary model, meaning output quality and model availability depend on upstream providers Imgraft does not control.
Leonardo.Ai
- Custom model training included in paid tiers (up to 50 models/month on Ultimate).
- Relaxed generation allows unlimited image/video generation on select models after tokens run out.
- Team plans share tokens and include team management and private generations.
- Token limits and rollover caps (e.g. 180,000 max bank) may constrain heavy users.
- Free tier creations are public and cannot be private.
- Pay-as-you-go API pricing and limits are not clearly detailed on the pricing page.
Our verdict
Imgraft verdict
Imgraft is the right pick for a solo creator who wants to experiment with image-to-image restyling without handing over a credit card first. Its credit math is transparent and the free Standard tier is genuinely usable, but monthly credits expire each billing period, which punishes light users who miss a month. If you need text-to-image generation, video, or an API, look at Leonardo.Ai instead.
Read full Imgraft review →Leonardo.Ai verdict
Best for creators who want detailed control over image and video generation and flexible token plans. It offers custom model training, relaxed generation, and team pooling, but token limits and rollover caps may frustrate heavy users. If you need unlimited, flat-rate generation, consider Midjourney instead.
Read full Leonardo.Ai review →