Imgraft vs NewYouGo
Imgraft vs NewYouGo: score breakdown
NewYouGo scores 68/100 against 66/100 for Imgraft, a 2-point gap. Imgraft is ahead on Ease of use (20 vs 19) and Value (18 vs 16); NewYouGo is ahead on Capability (18 vs 15) and Delivery (15 vs 13). Each sub-score is out of 25.
Features and platforms
| Feature | Imgraft | NewYouGo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Best for | Solo creators and hobbyists doing occasional photo restyling | Solo creators who want image, video, and music generation from a single credit pool |
| Skip if | Teams, developers needing API access, or anyone wanting text-to-image generation | Anyone who needs long-form video generation or deep image editing beyond background removal and upscaling |
Cost and usage limits
Imgraft has a free plan; paid plans start at $9.90/mo (Starter). NewYouGo has a free plan; paid plans start at $95/yr (Starter Yearly). NewYouGo's entry plan is cheaper by $1.98 a month ($7.92 vs $9.9, monthly equivalent).
Prices from each vendor's pricing page. Imgraft checked October 2026 · NewYouGo checked October 2026
Pros and cons
Imgraft
- Genuinely free Standard tier at 1K with no credit card required, letting new users test output quality before committing.
- Transparent credit cost table shown before generation: HD 1K costs 1 credit, 2K costs 2, 4K costs 3, with failed jobs returning reserved credits.
- Permanent one-time credit packs (100 for $9.99 up to 2,400 for $149.99) give irregular users a pay-as-you-go option without a recurring subscription.
- Subscription credits expire at the end of each billing period, so a Starter subscriber who skips a month loses unused credits from their $9.90 payment with no rollover.
- No API, no team workspace, and no integrations documented anywhere on the site, which rules out any developer or multi-seat use case entirely.
- Built on undisclosed third-party AI models rather than a proprietary model, meaning output quality and model availability depend on upstream providers Imgraft does not control.
NewYouGo
- Unusually transparent credit cost table shows the dollar equivalent per model and resolution before you generate, so budget planning is straightforward.
- Custom LoRA styling lets users apply consistent character or brand aesthetics across image generations, a feature absent from several direct competitors at this price point.
- All paid plans include a commercial license, even the entry-level Starter at $95/year, with no separate licensing fee.
- Video generation is capped at five-second clips through LTX-2, with no option for longer output; this is a hard ceiling that no plan upgrade removes.
- The free tier covers only FLUX.1 Schnell images and excludes video and music entirely, so the 'free' label overstates access to the platform's full feature set.
- No API access is mentioned on the pricing page or in the documentation, which rules out NewYouGo for any developer or team wanting to pipe generation into their own product.
Our verdict
Imgraft verdict
Imgraft is the right pick for a solo creator who wants to experiment with image-to-image restyling without handing over a credit card first. Its credit math is transparent and the free Standard tier is genuinely usable, but monthly credits expire each billing period, which punishes light users who miss a month. If you need text-to-image generation, video, or an API, look at Leonardo.Ai instead.
Read full Imgraft review →NewYouGo verdict
NewYouGo suits solo creators who want image, video, and music generation in one tab without juggling multiple subscriptions. Its image model roster is genuinely wide, but video output tops out at short clips and the Titan plan at $767/year is steep compared to what focused image rivals charge for similar output volume. If image quality is your primary concern and you do not need music or video, Leonardo.Ai gives you deeper image-specific tooling for less.
Read full NewYouGo review →